Post Acute Care Communication via Hucu.ai vs. Alternatives
 |  |  |  |  | “Old Ways” (email, txt, etc.) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HIPAA Compliant | ||||||
Increased Communication EFFICIENCY | ||||||
One BUSINESS-WIDE Communication Platform | ||||||
DIRECT Messaging plus Bespoke CHANNELS | ||||||
PATIENT-CENTERED Messaging Channels | ||||||
Designed for POST-ACUTE Workflows | ||||||
Ability to Communicate with Colleagues, Patients, and Patient’s Families all on ONE PLATFORM | ||||||
Communicate EASILY Across Different Organizations | ||||||
Affordable! |
Bottom Line
- Hucu.ai – get started with the free version – unlimited user licenses. no huge setup required. get patient-centered messaging going with other organizations quickly. clear visibility on patient risk and also around staff that’s at risk of leaving your organization.
- TigerConnect – expensive per user license is not viable for post-acute care organizations. huge uplift in installing and configuring the solution. messaging is only within an organization.
- OhMD – tons of issues on Android platform. also expensive per user license not viable for large post-acute care organizations. only built for brick & mortar clinics, and not for virtual healthcare teams. no ability to organize patient specific communication across different locations.
- Slack – charges per user license. not built for healthcare workflows. no patient risk or staff attrition risk visibility. no concept of healthcare communication needs.
- Old ways (phone, fax, ..) – limited to only 1-1 communication. most communication is in silos between 2 people, while the rest of the team is unaware and therefore not able to act in a timely manner.